Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Linda Noskova vs Amanda Anisimova Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Noskova vs Anisimova analysis and find out who is favored!
Linda Noskova vs Amanda Anisimova Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Noskova 1 - 0 Anisimova
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Noskova has won 47.13% of points on their second serve, while Anisimova has won 45.95%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Noskova, in recent form, has won 51.79% of their opponent's second serve points, while Anisimova has won 55.74%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.49% and 36.63% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Noskova has saved 58.79% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Anisimova has saved 57.52% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Noskova has won 62.96% of matches played (W/L 34/ 20), with Anisimova winning 50% (W/L 6/ 6) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Noskova has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 78% (W/L 43/ 12), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Anisimova has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 48/ 26), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Noskova has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 62.5% of matches (W/L 15/ 9), where as Anisimova has played most of their matches on the Grand Slam, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 4/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Noskova winning 1 times and Anisimova being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Noskova winning 2 and Anisimova winning 0. The last match between Noskova and Anisimova was at the BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells, 10-03-2023, Second, Hard with Linda Noskova getting the victory 7-6(6) 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:20:25.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Noskova and Anisimova have played a deciding set 0 times, with Noskova winning 0 times and Anisimova 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Noskova winning 1, and Anisimova 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Noskova has played against opponents with an average rank of 114.33 while Anisimova has played against players with an average rank of 73.08.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Noskova has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Anisimova has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Noskova has converted 43.88% of breakpoint opportunities, and Anisimova has converted 53.41% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
29
Rank
28
High
19
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
231
Rank
21
High
22
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
67% (136-66)
Career Total W/L
62% (146-91)
63% (17-10)
YTD W/L
50% (6-6)
$1,665,160
Career Prize Money
$3,403,931
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Linda Noskova | Amanda Anisimova |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:20:25 | 1:20:25 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (47/74) | 58% (38/66) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 72% (34/47) | 74% (28/38) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 37% (10/27) | 39% (11/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 33% (2/6) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (27/66) | 41% (30/74) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(6) 6-3 |
Stats 
Linda Noskova
Player
Amanda Anisimova
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
69
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Linda Noskova | Amanda Anisimova |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (17/10) | 50% (6/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (38/26) | 56% (15/12) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (315/305) | 50% (125/125) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 70% (14/6) | 67% (4/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 43% (3/4) | 33% (2/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.41 | 0.31 |
| Aces Total | 124 | 38 |
| DFs per game | 0.37 | 0.45 |
| DFs Total | 113 | 54 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:56 | 1:30:37 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 91.85 | 73.08 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1218/2003) | 61% (522/855) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (834/1218) | 59% (306/522) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (370/785) | 46% (153/333) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (86/196) | 53% (47/88) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (815/1999) | 44% (343/782) |
| Slam W/L | 71% (5/2) | 67% (4/2) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (5/5) | 0% (0/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 70% (7/3) | 50% (2/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (16/26) | 50% (6/12) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 89% (8/9) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 55% (6/11) | 0% (0/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 78% (18/14) | 67% (9/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 22% (18/4) | 33% (9/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (9/3) | 0% (3/0) |
Linda Noskova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Irina-Camelia Begu
Player
Linda Noskova
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Harriet Dart
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
52%
(
38 of
73)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Qinwen Zheng
Player
Linda Noskova
42%
(
30 of
71)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
90)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
29%
(
9 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
50%
(
35 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
51 of
90)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Linda Noskova
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
7
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
8 of
32)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
87)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Linda Noskova
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
76%
(
47 of
62)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
24 of
38)
8
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
2
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Iga Swiatek
Player
Linda Noskova
74%
(
73 of
98)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
99)
2
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
35 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
94
|
6-7(7) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Maria Timofeeva
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
89%
(
31 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
20 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Iga Swiatek
Player
Linda Noskova
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Amanda Anisimova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Liudmila Samsonova
Player
Amanda Anisimova
46%
(
16 of
35)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
88%
(
14 of
16)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
10 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
54
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Rebecca Sramkova
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
5
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
1
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Errani
Player
Amanda Anisimova
75%
(
59 of
79)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
0
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
9
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
49 of
84)
95
Total Points Won
68
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emiliana Arango
Player
Amanda Anisimova
76%
(
71 of
94)
1st Serve %
49%
(
49 of
99)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
26%
(
6 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
49%
(
46 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
51 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
94
|
1-6 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jessica Pegula
Player
Amanda Anisimova
58%
(
55 of
95)
1st Serve %
63%
(
80 of
126)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
46 of
80)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
58 of
126)
116
Total Points Won
105
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Alize Cornet
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Amanda Anisimova
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
75%
(
59 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
4
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
3
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Nadia Podoroska
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Liudmila Samsonova
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
47%
(
29 of
62)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
7
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Noskova Vs Anisimova Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
